#61 Resonant Water Fuel Cell 02


Please visit my web site alt-nrg.org for all the latest OU news. Unexpected capacitance results seem to be valid

25 Responses to “#61 Resonant Water Fuel Cell 02”

  1. O_O you get it but you don’t let it charge up to break point, god damn this whole search is annoying me to the core, i’m just gunna build the damn thing…

  2. Higher amperage at lower voltage

    Though the lower the voltage the more cataylst you need to add to lower the fluid resistance

  3. so thats why I am asking , what makes more gas: more Volts or Amps?

  4. Better have higher gas output, eheh! the other stuff is relative to cell construction… there are so many ways to make a big boom, the goal is the big boom, not how you make the boom! ^^

  5. TheTwistedGypsy on March 9th, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    @sebosfato something already happened to you…its called mental illness…hahahaha

  6. think of how your cell is made. now take apart an electrolytic capacitor, notice something? they are both made exactly the same. what you have IS a capacitor. it just gives off gas and is also a load
    put more electrolytes in your water and the capacitance will go down

  7. is it better to have higher Amperage an lower voltage or vice versa: lower amperage and higher voltage on plates?

  8. ZeroFossilFuel on March 9th, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    LOL! Nice one.

  9. losinmortales on March 9th, 2010 at 7:19 pm

    My friend, you should learn about “stan meyers”, he cleaned his ass with the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

  10. caveman200980 on March 9th, 2010 at 7:29 pm

    chinese fuel cell breaks 1st law of thermodynamics, so your wrong!
    also if it gives me extra 10mi to the gallon is good for me

  11. I’m holding out for the special power cord they’re presently transporting to the plug in, on the bottom of the sun.

  12. ZeroFossilFuel on March 9th, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    You’re welcome to express your opinion, even if it disagrees with mine. However, you may NOT spam my channel. One more duplicate post and you’re done. Got it?

  13. revolxaohemwolb on March 9th, 2010 at 8:43 pm

    “HHO” is a HHOax. These silly things take more energy from the crankshaft than they return. They will REDUCE fuel economy, but will NEVER increase it! Not unless you can find a 100% efficient alternator belt, 100% efficient alternator, 100% efficient electrolyser and a 100% efficient internal combustion engine, “HHO” systems won’t do so much as break even. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says ‘no free lunch!’

  14. less efficient, to much current leakage. Youtuber llewgnal is doing many tests with screens, but to this point the results are not satisfying. So far the plate configuration seems to give the best results. At least that is what most people have experienced. If you watch the following complete video from the beginning till the end then you will have your answer. watch?v=MF3OPg5GxAM

  15. use 4 sheets rolled up together?
    2 pos , 2 neg?

  16. 103shovelhead on March 9th, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    Hi! ZeroFossilFuel. Kev hear from OZ. I’am new to the suppHHO scene. I don’t want to stuff you around with my “jargon” but in your opinion does the spiral cell work better than a conventional flat plate drycell. I’am inspired by you blokes. Cheers Kev.

  17. hello mr zero. thanks for you work. I think you have answered this question a lot of times, but the question remains: Is the resonance a more efficient way of producing HHO than ordinary eletrolysis? What are the voltages produced in resonant cycles across the cell plates? Is enough to disrupt the resistance of water (in case of non use of any salt).

  18. I like your decision. I hate those Magniwork scammers just as much as anyone who knows anything.

    Another thing: try to stack those stainless steel “kitchen nets” used to take pasta out of boiling water. (Don’t know the name.)

    Put some plastic mosquito net in between to isolate, and connect them to your power supply. You will get much bigger contact area.

    Compare.

  19. He proved it, developed, implemented it. Did everything but market it, unfortunately. That doesn’t undermine his brilliance, but it is unfortunate. I’ve always wondered what electricity would look like if we had gone with Tesla’s ideas.

  20. zanardimotors on March 9th, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    Hello from Italy .
    ALL wonderfull !

  21. ZeroFossilFuel on March 9th, 2010 at 11:48 pm

    Um, pratinus, yes it is spam, and a scam. And now you are blocked from further posting.

    Have a nice day!

    Anyone else considering posting anything related to Magniwork, DON’T. You have been warned.

  22. That is not 316l by looking.

    IT NEED TO BE 316l INOX for VERY BETTER results.

    IT is BETTER if uses PVDF as spacer.
    If you want something great.

  23. Look up earth battery. It was used in the late 19th century for sending morse code.

  24. Check out Tesla’s work. He proved you could do it.

  25. danratsnapnames on March 10th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    telsa also demonstrated that energy stored in this flux, suffers little to NO loss. we use this method to make your CAR run today. tesla believed that this flux could be maintained for a indefinate period of time, adn thus allow someone to transport any amount of evergy inside of it. he also therorized that the earth its self was a capacitor, and spent the rest of his life trying to find a harmonic balance to the earth capacitor, which could draw from its parent.

Leave a Reply